Hip Resurfacing Vs Hip Replacement 2016

This article talks about some of the major differences between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.

Hip resurfacing vs hip replacement 2016.

These patients are too young for a total hip replacement because of the severe limitations after the surgery. Hip resurfacing a procedure that improves the function of your own hip joint may be a viable alternative to total hip replacement surgery. Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients. Results from long term data show that it can last just as long or longer than traditional hip replacement in young high demand patients especially men.

Additionally it also explores some of the possible advantages and disadvantages of hip resurfacing over hip replacement. Hip resurfacing is a less invasive approach to hip replacement and involves removing only the affected portions of the hip joint. How does it compare to conventional hip replacement. Unlike traditional hip replacement surgery resurfacing does not remove as much of your leg bone.

Importantly hip resurfacing needn t be looked at as a temporary procedure inevitably leading to hip replacement down the road. In a conventional hip replacement the pain from a diseased hip is relieved by replacing the ball and the socket. Since its fda approval in 2006 more than 3 000 hip.